Donetsk National Technical University
Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
https://ea.donntu.edu.ua/jspui/handle/123456789/27216| Title: | МОНІТОРИНГ ЕКОНОМІЧНОЇ ДІЯЛЬНОСТІ ДОМОГОСПОДАРСТВА НА РІЗНИХ РІВНЯХ: ТЕОРЕТИЧНІ ПРОБЛЕМИ ОБЛІКУ ТА СПЕЦИФІКА ДОСЛІДЖЕННЯ |
| Other Titles: | Моніторинг економічної діяльності домогосподарства на різних рівнях: теоретичні проблеми обліку та специфіка дослідження MONITORING HOUSEHOLDS' ECONOMIC ACTIVITIES AT DIFFERENT LEVELS: THEORETICAL PROBLEMS OF ACCOUNTING AND RESEARCH SPECIFICITY |
| Authors: | ЗУХБА, О.М. Зухба, О.М. ZUKHBA, E.N. |
| Keywords: | домогосподарство макроекономічні показники система національних рахунків домогосподарство макроекономічні показники истема національних рахунків household macroeconomic indicators national accounts monitoring households |
| Issue Date: | 2012 |
| Publisher: | ДонНТУ |
| Citation: | Наукові праці Донецького національного технічного університету. Серія: економічна. Випуск 42. – Донецьк, ДонНТУ, 2012. – 185 с. |
| Abstract: | Проаналізовано особливості моніторингу результатів економічної діяльності домогосподарства на різних рівнях і досліджено теоретичні проблеми їх обліку. Доведено, що існуючи макроекономічні показники не адекватно віддзеркалюють реальні результати економічної діяльності та доходи домогосподарств. Запропоновано використовувати макроекономічні показники залучення домогос подарства до ринкового середовища як об 'єктивні індикатори соціально-економічного стану суспільства. |
| Description: | Distribution of created wealth among households, other economic subjects and inside the household is one of the key objectives of economic decision-making, which is solved in dynamics. Objective definition of each economic entity's contribution to overall economic performance is required. It is proved that the existing system of macroeconomic indicators does not allow doing it and needs improving. First, monetary and natural payments by the state and other subjects to the households at the micro level may, in fact, differ from the similar financial flows between sectors at the macro level. The existing accounting system, based primarily on market estimates, can not adequately reflect the inkind flows, although they are households' incomes, in fact. In addition, we should distinguish between social benefits that the household sector receives directly and social grants which producers of sociallysignificant products receive. Secondly, the SNA recommends evaluating all results at market prices. In practice, it can mean that activity of some households, which mainly takes place in natural production, will be priced at market rates. With the increase in economic instability households will withdraw their resources from the market and refocus on subsistence farming. Such crisis trends cannot be seen in the existing accounting system can be seen since the results of the natural sector continue to be valued at market rates. The paradox is that the increase in the proportion and volume of natural activities of households in crisis leads not to the reduced national product at the macro level, but to their growth, according to the statistical indicators crisis can seem as economic growth and stability. The problem of evaluating the effectiveness of economic performance has its continuation in the theory of stratification. Household division into rich and poor should be based on criteria related to the behavior of households in the choice of natural or market behavior model. Poor households withdraw their resources from the market, the rich, on the contrary, are trying to invest, because they receive relatively higher rates of income. Therefore, the degree of naturalization of the household can serve as an objective criterion of economic stability and social justice. |
| URI: | http://ea.donntu.edu.ua/handle/123456789/27216 |
| Appears in Collections: | Випуск 42 |
Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.